e n

Bodhgaya movement : Mahadalits Wait for ‘Acche Din’

Kaushal Ganesh Azad, who was a key participant in the movement, insists that they have not given up the battle in spite of the failures and the setbacks. He says that despite his limited resources, he is working among the Mushars

It is the place where Mahatma Buddha attained enlightenment; it is the place where from Dr Viniyam to
Mahapandit Rahul Sankratayan to Swami Sahjanand Saraswati lived and worked; it is the place where
Naxalites honed their strategies. But Bodhgaya is also known for one another reason. It is the place where,
four decades ago, the Bodhgaya Mahant was dispossessed of 10,000 acres of land, which was distributed
among Mahadalit families. This movement was launched by the Chhatra-Yuva Sangharsh Vahini, led
by Jaiprakash Narayan.

Before the Vahini appeared on the scene, the CPI, the Socialist Party and various Naxal groups held their
sway here. A CPI worker was martyred in an attack by the goons of the Mahant but it was the Chhatra-Yuva
Sangharsh Vahini that brought the battle of the Mahadalitslandless farmers to its logical culmination and that too through its unique experiment of peaceful struggle. Two of its members were slain by the henchmen of the Mahant at Samastipur but the Vahini’s response was ‘Hamla Chahe Jaisa Ho, Hath Hamara Nahi Uthega” (You may attack us in any manner but we will not raise our hands). Later, however, it slightly digressed from its policy and one muscleman of the Bodhgaya Mahant was killed in a defensive action of the Vahini.

But the long and bitter struggle and the numerous sacrifices have gone in vain. Those who were allotted plots of land, especially those belonging to the Bhuiyan caste that formed the backbone of the Vahini’s agitation, have again become landless. They have lost the land they had got courtesy the Vahini’s struggle; as also the land they had received via the Bhoodan Andolan. The pace of loss of Bhoodan Andolan land was a bit slower, as the land was mainly barren and non-irrigated. However, the land allocated in the wake of the Vahini’s agitation was fully irrigated and under multi-cropping. On an average, around 80 to 90 per cent of the allotees have lost their land.

Bhuiyan-Mushars are mainly labourers. They have a long association with agriculture but only as farmhands. And they continue to toil on the fields of others. That is because after land was granted to them, no attempt was made to change their mindset. And neither was the infrastructure necessary for farming provided to them. Thus, the land slowly slipped out of their hands. Some examples will prove the point.

Around 199 acres of Bodhgaya Mahant’s land was distributed in Habibpur village of Dobhi block. Of it, nearly 55 acres has been sold. Four acres of land was kept aside in this village for community farming. The experiment is yet to commence and it lies barren. In village Bija of the same block, 800 acres of land was distributed. Of it, 150 acres have been mortgaged against loans. The landless had been allotted 500 acres under Bhoodan movement. Of it, 400 acres have been mortgaged. In village Parwatia, 15 acres of Mahant’s land was distributed, of which nine acres has been mortgaged. Jaiprakash had himself come to a village
in the Dobhi block. He had spent hours with the members of the Bhuiyan caste, talking about their future and weaving dreams of development. It was after this visit that the village was named Jaiprakash Nagar. It was the same village where journalist Manimala had tilled the land, challenging the patriarchal notion that only men can use the plough and the spade. Nearly 156 acres of Bhoodan land was distributed in this village. Of this, 131 acres lie barren and only 31 acres is under cultivation. Twelve acres have been sold. The members of the Bhuiyan caste of the village make a living by crushing stones and selling the gravel in the local market. From sunrise to sunset, right from the old women to the small kids – everyone is engaged in this job.

Here, it is important to note that this land has not gone into the hands of the members of the Savarna castes. The middle and dominant OBC castes have usurped it. The socio-economic condition of occupationbased middle OBCs, in some cases, is worse than that of Mahadalits. They have compromised on the health and education of their children, they have compromised on their food, they have chosen not to repair their houses to buy the land from the Mahadalits. Though the transfer of this land is patently illegal, any attempt to hand over the land again to the Mahadalits would create serious tension and disrupt the social harmony of the villages.

The core issue is that allotment of land to the landless was only a small part of a larger battle. That had to be followed up by a struggle for comprehensive socio-economic-political change. Various experiments
for community development should have been conducted. But for the leaders of the movement, all of whom were college students, it was merely a battle to snatch the land from big landowners and give it to the landless. For them, it was not a movement for sociopolitical transformation; it was a part-time activity. In such circumstances, it was too much to expect that they would have taken the agitation to its logical conclusion. The ultimate fallout of all this is that, today, the Mushar-Bhuiyan are worse off than they were when they had no land. Before the Bodhgaya land agitation, despite their miseries no Mushar-Bhuiyan could be seen begging on streets. But today, you can find them seeking alms outside the temples of Bodhgaya. They are converting to other religions because of financial allurements. The question is whether their lot has improved or worsened. And the answer is not difficult to guess.

On the other hand, the leaders who have emerged from the movement have latched themselves to big platforms and organizations and are busy packaging the movement. Some have joined politics and are leading a comfortable life. Others have become local czars, just as the Bodhgaya Mahant once was. Kaushal Ganesh Azad, who was a key participant in the movement, insists that they have not given up the battle in
spite of the failures and the setbacks. He says that despite his limited resources, he is working among the Mushars. But the fact is that there was no dearth of resources even when the so-called NGOs had not mushroomed in this area. A young Mushar of the village Bagula summarises the situation well. “No matter what, better days will come. We are the descendants of Dashrath Manjhi. The blood of Tulsiveer is coursing through our veins. Revolution is inevitable. The dream of ‘Sampoorna Kranti’ will not go waste. It will take
place. And this time, it will be irrepressible.”


Published in the July 2014 issue of the Forward Press magazine

Forward Press also publishes books on Bahujan issues. Forward Press Books sheds light on the widespread problems as well as the finer aspects of Bahujan (Dalit, OBC, Adivasi, Nomadic, Pasmanda) society, literature, culture and politics. Contact us for a list of FP Books’ titles and to order. Mobile: +919968527911, Email: info@forwardmagazine.in

About The Author

Devendra Kumar

Devendra Kumar is a freelance journalist and based in Ranchi

Related Articles

‘Laapataa Ladies’: A meaningful engagement with the aspirations of rural Indian women
The film serves as a springboard for further exploration, inviting viewers to delve deeper into the complexities of gender relations and advocate for a...
‘Amar Singh Chamkila’ ain’t the whole story
The fear of making the audience uncomfortable could be the reason the filmmaker has avoided engaging with the larger social and political question of...
‘Amar Singh Chamkila’ review: Caste is the elephant in the room
Despite Chamkila’s commentary on caste and class inequalities, director Imtiaz Ali appears to have opted to focus primarily on the familial dynamics and the...
‘Aatmapamphlet’ serves up Dalitbahujan discourse in a refreshingly new flavour
Marathi film ‘Aatmapamphlet’ is a commentary on Indian society from the perspective of children. It would not be an exaggeration to say that among...
Dalit reading of 1857 mutiny 
The Brahmin scholars who called the 1857 mutiny the first freedom struggle and dreamt of an ‘Akhand Hindu Bharat’ or the ‘undivided Hindu India’...