e n

Are we not Indians?

Denying citizens’ rights to the Tribals of the Saranda forest, who are the original inhabitants of Singhbhum, is not only unjust but also shameful

Johar Saheb”, I heard someone say. It was a hot May afternoon and I was passing through the forest of Saranda in Jharkhand. On hearing the greeting, I turned back and saw a group of Tribals, armed with spears, axes, bows and arrows, and catapults. They were on a hunting mission. Nothing unusual about that – what was unusual was that these Tribals were not Indian citizens. So, when they saw us, they abandoned their hunting plans and began relating to us their tale of woes. They, perhaps, thought that we were government officials who could help them secure citizenship and civic rights. They said that they have no documents to prove that they are the citizens of India.

Political and civil rights are crucial for all of us. It is unfortunate that this great democracy is denying citizenship and voting rights to these Tribals. They are worried that if they do not get land ownership documents under the Forests Rights Act, they may be labelled encroachers and hounded out of the forests anytime. And if they resist, they would be thrown behind bars as “infiltrators” or “Naxalites”. In the 1960s, inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s non-violent movement, Martin Luther King Jr had launched a civil rights movement to secure voting rights for the African Americans. Will the Tribals also have to launch a similar movement to get citizenship and voting rights?

The game of eviction

11754328_844408785643716_1179978877223012314_o copyHolding bow and arrows and covered in sweat, Vijay Kerai said that during the forest movement of the 1980s, around 105 members of 20 Tribal families had cleared a part of the jungle and settled there. They named their village Jojodera. When the Forest Rights Act came into force in January 2008, the villagers approached the Manoharpur block office seeking ownership rights over the land. However, their application was rejected. They say that the government had leased out land near the village, at Karmapada, to the Mittal company for extracting iron ore and was not giving them “pattas” so that the company does not face any problems in seeking forest and environmental clearances for its mining project.

In Saranda, instead of doing its primary duty of protecting the forests, the Forest Department is busy implementing its “divide and rule” policy. Some outsiders are being settled in the area and this is being opposed by the original settlers. This dispute may be used to evict all the residents from the forest. The forest mafia and Forest Department are in cahoots and every day, thousands of people ferry logs of Sakhua tree on bicycles and supply them to forest contractors.

Not only that, but in the name of the anti-naxal campaign, CRPF jawans have burnt down the forest spread over thousands of acres on both sides of the road.

Sushil Barla, an activist of Manoharpur, conducted a sample survey of 17 forest villages in the Bihand area of Saranda forest to get a feel of the ground situation. None of the 1,918 members of 431 Tribal families residing in these villages has any document to prove their citizenship. They don’t have a voter ID card, ration card, Aadhaar card or any other document. It is clear that legally, they are not citizens of India and can be evicted from the Saranda forest anytime. Salika Jojo of Jojodera wants to know, “Are we Indians? Why have we not been given any documents to prove our citizenship? We supported the Jharkhand movement but still did not get justice. Have we committed any crime by living in a forest? Why is the government discriminating against us? Is it because we are Tribals?

Details of villages that don’t figure in the census

Sr No


Name of village


Number of families


Total population



1. Kulatupa


47 213
2. Badikudar



21 109
3. Jojodera



20 105
4. Gatigada 12 55
5. Marida 23 93
6. Topkoy 19 96
7. Koynarbeda 31 108
8. Jamardeeh 33 113
9. Toybo 15 76
10. Kasigada 24 93
11. Ratamati 10 57
12. Nuyigada 47 226
13. Rogada 24 109
14. Gundijora 23 118
15. Chumagdiri 20 105
16. Lailor 42 171
17. Nurda 20 71
                Total 431 1918


Deaf and dumb government

Taking cognizance of the complaint of Sushil Barla, the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes, on 17 October 2014, wrote to Secretary – Tribal Welfare of the Government of Jharkhand and Deputy Commissioner of West Singhbhum district, seeking to know why the 3,000-odd Tribals residing in the 35 forest villages of Saranda had not been given land ownership rights under the Forest Rights Act 2006; why, despite being dependent on agriculture and forests for their livelihood, they have no voter IDs and ration and Aadhaar Cards and are being deprived of basic educational and health facilities.

Using powers bestowed on it by the Article 338(A) of the Constitution, the Commission ordered the Jharkhand government to ensure that voter ID cards, ration cards and Aadhaar cards are issued to the Tribals at the earliest. Also, that they should be provided basic facilities like roads, power, education and health. The Commission had asked the state government to respond within 15 days. But the state government still hasn’t responded. Interestingly, in the year 2001, the IGP of West Chhotanagpur had written to the home secretary and DGP informing them that there were around 200 villages in the Saranda forest which had no mention in the government documents. However, the communication went unheeded.

Sometime ago, the Union government announced that the Hindu refugees from Bangladesh would be given Indian citizenship. Isn’t it ironical that the Tribals of the Saranda forest are being denied citizenship rights when they are original inhabitants of Singhbhum? This is not only illegal but shameful and unjust, too.

Published in the August 2015 issue of the FORWARD Press magazine

About The Author

Gladson Dungdung

Gladson Dungdung is a human rights activist, writer and thinker 

Related Articles

These suffocating private universities are helping no one
The ignorance of Galgotias University students is indicative of the larger rot that is setting in in higher education through the proliferation of private...
‘Laapataa Ladies’: A meaningful engagement with the aspirations of rural Indian women
The film serves as a springboard for further exploration, inviting viewers to delve deeper into the complexities of gender relations and advocate for a...
SC-ST victims of atrocities denied at least ₹1140 crores in relief over the period 2015-22, finds study
The monetary relief pertains to a national scheme instituted early in the first term of the Narendra Modi-led NDA government at the Centre
‘Amar Singh Chamkila’ ain’t the whole story
The fear of making the audience uncomfortable could be the reason the filmmaker has avoided engaging with the larger social and political question of...
‘Amar Singh Chamkila’ review: Caste is the elephant in the room
Despite Chamkila’s commentary on caste and class inequalities, director Imtiaz Ali appears to have opted to focus primarily on the familial dynamics and the...