e n

India talks Ambedkar but social justice isn’t on her agenda

Ambedkar made sure that the idea of social justice informed our Constitution. But those who control the politics and economy and are therefore responsible for implementing it, have been dragging their feet through the years. Now, they have no qualms about undermining it either

Dr B.R. Ambedkar fought for social justice. He was aware of the injustice suffered by the indigenous people of India who are the makers of the history and destiny of the country. Entrusted with chairmanship of the drafting committee of the Constituent Assembly, he utilized the opportunity to secure social justice to the vast sections of the Indian populace who suffered from multifaceted injustices due to the caste system and communalism. Ambedkar incorporated several measures in the Constitution of India to liberate and empower women and weaker sections of Indian society.

The concept of social justice emerged from an evolution of social norms, order, law and morality across the globe. Social justice is achieved when liberty, equality and fraternity become features of society. According to Rousseau men are equal by nature but the institution of private property has made them unequal and perpetuated inequalities. Communists believe that the source of injustice is the private ownership of the means of production, which creates the classes of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.

A demonstration demanding implementation of reservations

Social justice demands an end to discrimination on the basis of caste, sex, religion, race or region, and equal distribution of economic goods and opportunities. Social justice is the foundation of democracy. Social, economic and political justice was the ideal for which the Russian revolution (1917) was fought. Ambedkar incorporated several provisions in the draft Constitution, not all of which were ratified, to ensure justice to the deprived sections of Indian society.

Constitutional provisions for social justice

Constitutional scholar Granville Austin observes: “probably no other Constitution in the world has provided so much impetus towards changing and rebuilding society for the common good. Social justice is the idea of creating a society or institution that is based on the principles of equality and solidarity, that understands and values human rights, and that recognizes the dignity of every human being.” Here, Austin is talking about the Indian Constitution. The Constitution of India recognizes both social and economic justice as the prerequisites for good governance.

Ambedkar and some of the other members of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly

In particular, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens the right to freedom of speech and expression. The citizens are free to mobilize the individuals and organizations against social injustice and exploitation.

Articles 23 and 24 provide protection against exploitation. Article 23 prohibits the trafficking of human beings and forced labour. Article 24 prohibits an employer from employing a child below the age of 14 years in any factory or mine or in any other hazardous work.

Chapter IV contains Articles 36 to 51, which are the directive principles of State policy. Article 38 requires that the State make an effort to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice – social, economic and political – shall inform all the institutions of national life.

Article 39 contains six clauses which emphasize that citizens, men and women equally, have the right to an adequate means to livelihood; ownership and control of material resources of the community should be so distributed as to promote the common good; operation of the economic system should not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment; equal pay for equal work for both men and women; citizens should not be forced by economic necessity to enter vocations unsuited to their age or strength; children should be given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity; and childhood and youth should be protected against exploitation and against moral and material abandonment.

Article 41 recognizes every citizen’s right to work, to education and, to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement and in other cases of undeserved want. Article 42 stresses the importance of securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief. Article 43 guarantees a living wage to citizens. Article 46 directs the State to promote the educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other weaker sections.

Article 15 (1) prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It says that the State would be entitled to make special provisions for women and children, and for advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens, including the socially oppressed sections like the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. A similar exception is provided to the principle of equality of opportunity in Article 16, which makes provision for the resolution of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State.

Article 17 proclaims that untouchability has been abolished and forbids its practice in any form, making it punishable under the law.

This is the code of provisions that paves the way for socio-economic justice in this country.

The Supreme Court of India, ruling in D.S. Nakara vs Union of India, (1983) held that the principal aim of a socialist state is to eliminate inequality in income, status and standard of life. Social justice has become the test for the validity of State actions.

Implementation of laws pertaining to social justice

As former chief justice P.B. Gajendragadkar said, “Social justice holds the aims of equal opportunity to every citizen in the matter of social and economic activities and to prevent inequalities.” The concept of social justice has dual objectives of “removing all inequality” and affording equal opportunities for “economic activities of all the citizens”. The core element of social justice is equal social worth requiring that citizens be guaranteed certain social, economic, civil and political rights.

The Supreme Court has firmly stood by social justice as the guiding force of the judicial pronouncements. Social justice and economic justice are the two faces of the same coin. Social justice and economic justice together have been called “distributive justice” (Pathak, 2016:02). The judiciary has been ruling in favour of affirmative governmental actions that facilitated distributive justice to all classes of citizens.

Apart from reservations for the SCs, STs and OBCs in higher educational institutions and public employment, the Government of India steered the Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act (2007) and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act (2013) through Parliament and has introduced the following programmes and policies: The National Policy on Older Persons (1999), Antyodaya Anna Yojana (2000), , National Scholarship for Students of Backward Sections (2008), Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (2008), National Programme for Healthcare of the Elderly (2011), Varisht Pension Bima Yojana (2014), Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (2015), Senior Citizens Health Insurance Scheme (2016) and Senior Citizen Saving Scheme (2019). State governments have also implemented several such laws and programmes.

However, Ambedkar had expressed serious concerns about the implementation of the Constitutional provisions for social justice since Indian politics was dominated by socially powerful and economically dominant sections of society. He had called upon Dalits, Backwards, Minorities and other weaker sections of society to capture political power, implement Constitutional provisions and establish social and economic democracy in India (Bohra, 2015:01). He had strongly advocated complementing political independence with social justice and economic democracy.

The rulers of independent India so far have adopted the policy of divide and rule and disintegrated the backward sections of society. Casteist and market forces have controlled political parties, obstructing the delivery of distributive social justice.

Threats to Social Justice and weaker sections   

A series of progressive mass movements were organized in 1970s and 1980s in India for the rights of farmers, workers, Minorities, Dalits, Adivasis and backward sections of society. Unfortunately, today, the politics of social justice has come to mean electoral victories of a few people hailing from deprived communities. Social justice has been confined to the issue of reservations in government jobs and in government-run institutions of higher learning. At the most, some people demand that reservations should be extended to the private sector. The ruling class is bent upon splitting the struggle of the Bahujan sections into different cells purely for political reasons. The emergence of majoritarianism has led to the social, economic and political domination of the majority over the minority and the undermining of the latter’s culture (Ranjan, 2016).

A man holds a placard during a protest against attacks on Dalits

It was Brahmanism that created castes millennia ago. The new economic policy implemented by the government in the 1990s worsened the social and economic conditions (Sharma, 2017: 04). While more reservation was introduced, jobs in the public sector started disappearing due to the policy of disinvestment and expansion of the private sector. The weaker sections of society were the worst victims of economic liberalization. Now, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the proponents of the caste order, is more politically powerful than ever before and its grip on the government is the strongest yet.

Then there has been interference of the executive in the judiciary as revealed by four judges of the Supreme Court in a press conference in early 2018. Social justice too could become a casualty of such interferences. Thus, the pillars of the Constitution have become weak on account of the threats to secular and socialist character of the Constitution (Vombatkere, 2018:07).

The reservation policy has never been implemented properly by the government due to lack of social commitment and a proactive approach (Thirumavalavan, 2019:06). Now, the government has granted 10 per cent reservation in public employment and institutions of higher learning to the economically weak sections in the general category (the upper castes). The issue of representation of the historically deprived sections of society, the lowered castes, has thus been undermined.

The neglect of the farming sector has affected the farmers deeply. The workers are not given adequate employment benefits in the burgeoning private sector. Absence of a judicial mix of machines and manual labour has resulted in the marginalization of the poor and needy.

Ambedkar is talked about more than ever today, for the mention of the great man can fetch votes. Yet, social justice is missing from the conversations and the policies of the government. It is as if Ambedkar had fought all his life in vain. The last thing he wanted was to be hero-worshipped.


1.      Bohra, Saroj (2015), Social Justice and Indian Constitution, International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies, 2(1): 1-17, www.ijlljs.in

2.      Pathak, Puneet (2016), Social Justice Under Indian Constitution, International Journal of Legal Developments and Allied Issues, 2(3): 33-42, www.ijldai.thelawbrigade.com

3.      Ranjan, Pramod (2016), Threats to the concept of social justice, Forward Press, April 6, New Delhi, India, www.forwardpress.in

4.      Sharma, Mohit (2017), Constitution of India and Social Justice, International Journal of Scientific Development and Research, 2(5): 285-287, www.ijsdr.org

5.      Shashikant (2012), Constitution of India and Social Justice, Muntazir, June 27, www.gymkhana.iitb.ac.in

6.      Thirumavalavan, Thol (2019), Reservation based on Economic Status will Annihilate Social Justice, Interview, Round Table India, July 19, www.roundtableindia.co.in      

7.      Vombatkere S.G (2018), Is There a Threat to the Constitution?, The Citizen, February, 9, www.thecitizen.in

Forward Press also publishes books on Bahujan issues. Forward Press Books sheds light on the widespread problems as well as the finer aspects of Bahujan (Dalit, OBC, Adivasi, Nomadic, Pasmanda) society, culture, literature and politics. Contact us for a list of FP Books’ titles and to order. Mobile: +917827427311, Email: info@forwardmagazine.in)

About The Author

B.P. Mahesh Chandra Guru

Dr B.P. Mahesh Chandra Guru is professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism, University of Mysore. He is the first Dalit-Buddhist professor of media studies, who, apart from teaching journalism over the past three decades, has held important administrative positions at the state and national levels. He has been a member of both the Karnataka State Service Commission and Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) and has been part of University Grants Commission (UGC) committees. He has published more than ten books in English and Kannada. Prof Guru has been involved in movements and discourses informed by Dalitbahujan consciousness

Related Articles

‘Laapataa Ladies’: A meaningful engagement with the aspirations of rural Indian women
The film serves as a springboard for further exploration, inviting viewers to delve deeper into the complexities of gender relations and advocate for a...
‘Amar Singh Chamkila’ ain’t the whole story
The fear of making the audience uncomfortable could be the reason the filmmaker has avoided engaging with the larger social and political question of...
‘Amar Singh Chamkila’ review: Caste is the elephant in the room
Despite Chamkila’s commentary on caste and class inequalities, director Imtiaz Ali appears to have opted to focus primarily on the familial dynamics and the...
‘Aatmapamphlet’ serves up Dalitbahujan discourse in a refreshingly new flavour
Marathi film ‘Aatmapamphlet’ is a commentary on Indian society from the perspective of children. It would not be an exaggeration to say that among...
Ambedkar the democrat shone in the making of the Indian Constitution
Unlimited powers were not vested in the Indian president. Instead, it was Parliament which was vested with all the powers. That was meant to...