On 6 April 2022, the Supreme Court made a very telling comment on the Right to Education (RTE) Act. A division bench of Justices Shripathi Ravindra Bhat, U.U. Lalit and P. S. Narasimha said that while proposing any programme, the government should take its financial implications into account. The bench noted that the Right to Education Act was a classic example of what happens when this is not done. The law has been promulgated but there aren’t enough schools to ensure its implementation.
Related Articles
Savarna sympathy, Dalit erasure: A critique of cinematic morality in Telugu film ‘Dacoit’
By the time viewers leave the theatre, the Dalit protagonist’s fate does not register as the consequence of caste transgression, of loving across rigid...
Pluralisation challenges to contemporary anti-caste movements
Contemporary anti-caste movements have become experts in pluralism (counting identities, demanding quotas) but have lost the art of pluralisation. The global crisis of democracy...
Harassment in higher education institutions until UGC Regulations 2026
The fact is that after Mandal took effect, harassment in the institutions of higher learning turned increasingly vicious. It was euphemistically called ragging, masking...
Muslim OBC movement has lost a tenacious fighter
Shabbir Bhai was always on the move. He toured the entire Maharashtra. There can’t be any village in the state with a Pasmanda population...
Atrocities against Dalits: Fading hope for justice
On an average, seven of every ten accused charged under the SC-ST (PoA) Act, 1989 are acquitted. This is a matter of deep concern...