On 6 April 2022, the Supreme Court made a very telling comment on the Right to Education (RTE) Act. A division bench of Justices Shripathi Ravindra Bhat, U.U. Lalit and P. S. Narasimha said that while proposing any programme, the government should take its financial implications into account. The bench noted that the Right to Education Act was a classic example of what happens when this is not done. The law has been promulgated but there aren’t enough schools to ensure its implementation.
Related Articles
Rajasthan’s ‘Sarpanch Pati’ problem
A woman who does not appear prominently in campaign material, speak at public meetings or meet voters independently has fewer opportunities to establish her...
Citizens, not media houses, are the fourth pillar of democracy
When the press is designated the fourth pillar, it is with reference to its role as a watchdog. But there is a basic difference...
Jantar Mantar is an institution for collective freedom of expression
The State has been consistently trying to make the echoes of the right to freedom of expression inaudible to Parliament. It has been using...
Why and how I wrote the novel ‘Harappa: God’s City of Civilisation’
Neither Ayodhya named in the Ramayana nor Dwaraka named in the Mahabharata have proven excavational evidence of having been ancient cities. My novel, on...
Obituary: Rupi Soren and the long wait for Shibu’s homecoming
Rupi Soren used to run her household with the help of her mother-in-law, Sonamani, and the wife of Shibu’s elder brother, Rajaram. Whether it...