On 6 April 2022, the Supreme Court made a very telling comment on the Right to Education (RTE) Act. A division bench of Justices Shripathi Ravindra Bhat, U.U. Lalit and P. S. Narasimha said that while proposing any programme, the government should take its financial implications into account. The bench noted that the Right to Education Act was a classic example of what happens when this is not done. The law has been promulgated but there aren’t enough schools to ensure its implementation.
Related Articles
Remembering Prof Imtiaz Ahmad: A scholar, teacher and humanist
Whenever I found myself struggling with an intellectual, emotional, or moral dilemma, he would ask me to quietly walk into his personal library, take...
Beyond welfare and reservations: The unfinished business of social justice in Tamil Nadu
Ultimately, for a welfare-based system to withstand the volatile pressures of a digital attention economy, it must evolve from a mechanism for ensuring material...
When will we, the truly despised cockroaches, create a viral campaign?
Every decade produces brilliant Dalitbahujan voices who critique power with precision and then watch power ignore them, not because the critique was wrong, but...
Vijay Varma plays his part in Nagraj Manjule’s realistic portrait of 1960s-70s Bombay
‘Matka King’ is a confident, character-first swing by a director in the process of expanding his range. It celebrates the intoxicating dream of upward...
Bastar’s aspirational Adivasi schoolchildren have few viable futures
This contradiction lies beneath the language of ‘mainstreaming’. State institutions encourage young people to become disciplined, aspirational, and future-oriented, even while the opportunities available...